If one link fails, the entire chain breaks

From 2017 onwards, Switzerland is to control its immigration policy independently. This policy jeopardises ETH Zurich's position as a top university in the world in the long term, as ETH Rector Lino Guzzella explained to members of parliament last week.

Enlarged view: Immigration: a challenge for ETH
Today, the lights are still green: Top-level Swiss research is currently highly competitive. But will that still be the case in 20 or 30 years’ time? (Photo: ETH Zurich/Alessandro Della Bella)

Before the year is out, the Swiss Federal Council plans to adopt a mandate for renegotiation Switzerland’s agreement with the EU on the free movement of persons. At the same time, it intends to submit a draft act on how Switzerland can control its own immigration policy.

Since the referendum on 9 February 2014, a constitutional mandate has been in place which stipulates that Switzerland must restrict the number of residence permits granted to foreign citizens by introducing annual maximum limits and quotas from 2017.

This restriction will also affect foreign staff and students at Swiss universities. Politicians will discuss the extent to which researchers and students will be subject to quotas in future (there is a certain amount of leeway for students, for example) over the coming months.

ETH Zurich mandate at risk

In the long term, excessive restrictions on immigration will pose a threat to ETH Zurich’s mandate to expand its position at the forefront of international education and research and share its findings with Swiss business and society. “We have a mandate to ensure that Switzerland has access to globally available knowledge. To fulfil this mandate, we need to secure the top talent.”

Those were the words of Lino Guzzella, Rector and President-elect of ETH Zurich, speaking before members of the Parliament in Berne last Thursday in a session organised by the Parliamentary Group on Education, Research and Innovation (external pagePG BFI) and the external pageFUTURE network. Lino Guzzella was joined on the podium by Silvio Ponti, Deputy CEO of the specialty chemicals company Sika and an ETH graduate, and Mario Gattiker, Director of the Federal Office for Migration.

Lino Guzzella expressed his dissatisfaction with the latest developments, pointing out that science depends on international exchange and that the foreign professors, who make up two thirds of ETH Zurich’s professorial staff, play a hugely important role in securing the university’s international status and networks.

Dependant on access to world markets

Guzzella and the industry representative agreed that both research and production must have free access to global markets if they are to avoid descending into mediocrity. “I don’t want to have to beg for quotas, but the signs are not good,” Guzzella said, commenting on the immigration restrictions. That applies to both ETH Zurich and research-based industry. “Even if just a single link fails, the entire chain breaks,” Guzzella concluded.

He warned that a decline of this kind would not happen instantly, but would gradually creep in over the next 20 years. However, dark clouds have already started to appear on the horizon: the European Union, for example, has made any access to its markets dependent on the Agreement on the Free Movement of Persons.

What is more, young Swiss talent is now excluded from participating in European research competitions for pupils. “Making the future difficult for young people cannot be a good thing,” said Guzzella. Switzerland is also no longer fully associated with the Erasmus+ and Horizon 2020 research programmes.

In a weaker position

The future of Switzerland’s participation in the EU programmes has been a topic in every recent interview with researchers interested in undertaking a professorship at ETH Zurich. In Guzzella’s view, it is clear that the uncertain situation is currently undermining ETH compared to other top universities.

He conceded that things are still going well at the moment as the professors already employed at ETH Zurich are staying put. “But in 20 years’ time,” he added, “we will find that we are only a third-rate institution.”

And what is the situation at ETH Zurich in terms of giving priority to Swiss candidates, which is also stipulated by the constitutional mandate? Swiss students dominate the ETH student body and the Swiss are also very well represented from doctorial to professorial levels: “Even if we exhaust the pool of talent available in Switzerland, that will not be enough to keep us in a competitive position.”

In the discussion following Guzzella’s speech, it was said that quotas do not necessarily mean a damaging effect on research, what matters most is how they are organised. It was suggested that politicians cannot set quotas purely in relation to the labour market and education; instead, an assessment encompassing the whole of society is required.

Enlarged view: Lino Guzzella speaking before members of the Parliament in Berne
Lino Guzzella speaking before members of the Parliament in Berne: “We have a mandate to ensure that Switzerland has access to globally available knowledge.” (Photo: ETH Zürich/Florian Meyer)
JavaScript has been disabled in your browser